Monday, March 31, 2008

Does Any of this Sound Disturbingly Familiar?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vISWAgy_emg

I have a friend who was fired from a seminar for young chozrot b'tsuvah when she became an agunah. Though she loved her job and the young women at the seminar loved her, they let her go because they didn't want the young women there to know about aginut.

Talking about hiding information.

What this woman describes very briefly sure sounds a lot like my experience with CHaBa"D, which I was strong enough to get out of in less than two years.

It sounds even more like a relative's experience with Breslov, which she was strong enough to get out of in about the same amount of time.

It took me about 10 years to recover from my experience with CHaBa"D.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com
The Trouble With Satanists is That They Give Satan a Bad Name

Please see this video entitled "The Matrix of Illusion":

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ktpCoztGAgM

Notice they can't break out of thinking that matter exists independently.Neither can they break out of mathematics, nor can they break out of their culture's terminology and thinking - matrix, hologram, fractal...

This is a high level of using the mind, but that's all it is - a high level of using the mind. Everything that they speak of is firmly within the realm of mind. Thus, it can be manipulated and controlled by those on a higher level of technical knowledge.There are levels beyond mind and we are intended to attain them, though we balk and resist. The realm of mind is all about knowing on the technical level. Understanding is the transition stage between knowing and wisdom. Higher levels are wisdom. Wisdom cannot be controlled; neither does it seek to control.
The "Illuminati", or whatever your favorite flavor of bad guys, actually serve to impel and compel us to get beyond the level of mind by making the realm of mind unbearable.Unwittingly, they serve a higher purpose.Everything, including "evil", serves God's purpose.

Satanists give Satan a bad name, as do the Christians, the handmaidens of the Satanists. Both think that Satan stands in opposition to God.

There is no greater servant of God, or Teacher, than Satan. But God help you if your heart isn't set right. Satan does not have a queasy stomach and will make you endure whatever you must endure in order for you to grow if you refuse to allow yourself to grow from knowing to understanding to wisdom.

Satan does not wish to be worshipped, as the Satanists and Christians say. Nothing could be further from the truth. Satan is unwaveringly loyal to God and wants you to be as well.
Satan adores God of its own free will and wants you to as well, knowing that can only come of your free will. Satan is that which is capable of evil, but chooses the good. Satan is that which has renounced evil, putting all of its vast powers and abilities that it could, and once did, use for evil to the purpose of the good. And know this and take it to heart and mind: the renunciation of evil effects the rectification of all evil done, past, present and future and on all levels and transforms it into redoubled good.

Do not be so foolish as to think: Well, then, I'll do evil now and rectify it sometime in the future. Your perception of time, including your perception of future, is in accordance with your understanding and your understanding is in accordance with the good you do for others.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Five Minutes to 9 11 Truth

Watch this. It's a very important 3 mins, 41 seconds to invest for anyone who cares about 9/11 truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw&feature=related

In the video above he says he was in the classroom.

Listen to this minute of BS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw&feature=related

They really ought to bring him in and finetoon his programming.

D2

Monday, March 24, 2008

Unholy Canada-Israel Alliance

This is extremely peculiar given the geographical distance between the two countries, but most particularly in light of SPP and NAU.

Do not make the mistake of thinking that because this is not legally binding that they are taking it lightly.

It means only that they do not wish to be constrained by legalities when committing human rights violations.

Declaration of Intent Between the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada and the Ministry of Public Security of the Government of the State of Israel

http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/media/nr/2008/nr20080323-1-eng.aspx

Signed in duplicate at Tel Aviv, this 23rd day of March, 2008, which corresponds to the 16th day of Adar b'5768, in the English, French, and Hebrew languages with all texts being equally valid.

For The Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada

For The Ministry of Public Security of the Government of the State of Israel

This does not auger well.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Rockefeller Is a Socialist, Actually an Anarcho-Capitalist, Too

It would not be an exaggeration to say that your brand of "Anarchism" is modeled on his. He's certainly spent enough money arranging things that way.

"1973. After a trip to China, David Rockefeller praised Mao Tse-tung who had slaughtered over 40 million people. His report, "From a China Traveler," highlights the goals presented in UN reports such as "
The Commission on Global Governance" and UNESCO's Our Creative Diversity. Both focus on lofty ideals such as peace, harmony and unity in the communitarian "global" village -- a vision that demands absolute control and universal participation in facilitated small groups (modeled by the hierarchy of "soviets" or councils in Communist lands):

"One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony.... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded... in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly form the singleness of ideology and purpose.... The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history." New York Times, 8-10-1973.""

I heartily suggest that you read these two pages in their entirety:

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.htm

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/rockefeller.htm

If you will be honest, you'll see a lot of your brand of Socialism in the Rockefeller "vision".

Many have been the time I have heard paraphrases of the following statement made by Rockefeller issuing from the mouths of "Anarchists":

"The anti-Rockefeller focus of these otherwise incompatible political positions owes much to Populism. 'Populists' believe in conspiracies, and one of the most enduring is that a secret group of international bankers and capitalists, and their minions, control the world's economy. Because of my name and prominence as the head of the Chase for many years, I have earned the distinction of 'conspirator in chief' from some of these people."

Every time you, would-be Anarchist or Socialist, call a true Anarchist and Socialist, one who has not been pre-empted by the system, a "conspiracy theorist" when they describe to you the social engineering that is being carried out on you; you are not stating your own opinion or speaking from knowledge that you have gleaned over a period of diligent and assiduous research. You are parroting Rockefeller and Bush, or, more correctly, the cheap agents they have placed in your midst, who have modeled their brand of"Anarchy" and "Socialism" for you and which you are emulating.

That should come as no surprise. The non-Marxist Left has been a major target of infiltration and PsyOps since the 1970s.

This is the new "Socialism" as well:

The Takedown of Australia!

"Australia's implementation of Agenda 21 exceeds that of all other common law countries. The citizens of Queensland, Australia have had their property rights stripped so to advance the globalist political agenda. Read how the State of Queensland is now removed from the protections of the Australian Constitution. A privately owned state corporation now owns and controls all land-use activity in Queensland. This horrific experience is destroying the life and culture of those living there and provides a prototype example of what public/private partnership really means.


This powerful document was produced by Sue and Lindsay Maynes and the EnviroWild Team of Australia. "

You can read the entire article here:

http://www.freedomadvocates.org/option,com_docman/task,doc_details/Itemid,20/gid,126/

That is what your near future looks like.

Today, 30 – 40% of prisoners in the US are incarcerated in privately-owned prisons. The organization that own those prisons are highly lucrative businesses that float their stocks on Wall Street. Their cost-effectiveness is the deprivation and degradation of human beings. Their partnerships involve allowing unethical research to be performed on the prisoners. This is Lysander Spooner's, and more so, Benjamin Tucker's "dream". Anarcho-Capitalism is precisely what the Rockefellers are after.

I'll leave you with another thought. The Rockefellers are not at the top of the pyramid. They, like JP Morgan belong to a class of underlings, a class of "lieutenants". They are controlled by a very few people whose fortunes are so vast, mere billionaires do their bidding. Those people are the Rothschilds.

I am an individualist Anarchist on the personal and social level and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level, that is, the only kind of true Anarchist, not an Anarcho-Communist as they have been portrayed to you and not an Anarcho-Communist as they came to conduct themselves after being heavily infiltrated. I am an individualist Anarchist on the personal and social level and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level from the old school. I may very well be the last Anarchist of this breed on earth if you refuse to disable the implants in your psyches that are triggered whenever you hear a buzz word or see certain symbols.

The only true Anarchism is individualist Anarchism on the personal and social level and and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level.

All the rest of it is nuance, like Green individualist Anarchism on the personal and social level and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level, Queer individualist Anarchism on the personal and social level and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level, Feminist individualist Anarchism on the personal and social level and and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level, Primitivist individualist Anarchism on the personal and social level and Anarcho-Communist on the economic level, etc.

Any vestiges of capital in a society will lead to the amassing of capital, which leads to Plutocracy and Corporatism, which is Fascism.

Never will a David Rockefeller, or anyone like him be able to say of me:

"Jiang Zemin, president of the People's Republic of China and heir apparent to Deng Xiaoping; Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic... Yasser Arafat... and, finally, Fidel Castro.... With the exception of Havel, these men had vowed to fight to the death against imperialist America. Now, with the end of the Cold War, they flocked to the center of world capitalism, eager to meet and close deals with American bankers and corporate executives, or at least to be seen with them -- even Castro"

I know damn well they could buy the lot of you for far less, in fact, they have. But I also know that you are capable of ransoming yourselves, if you will.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Chomsky on 911, I mean 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4&feature=related

How could anyone not believe Chomsky? He's the most credible Anarchist, I mean fellow traveller, out there.

He has been working at MIT for fiver decades, a job he originally got, some who worked with him in the '70s say, on a gov't contract.

His linguistic theories provide the basis for neuro-linguistic programming (that's heavy mind control, folks).

He lives in Lexington, MA, average income per annum - $111,000, but is a member of IWW.

In his book CHOMSKY ON ANARCHISM he says that MIT has been a great place to work for him stating: "I've been able to do the things I want to do." He admits that MIT is part of the military-industrial complex.

In that same book, he mentions someone who worked at MIT who got fired for being too radical in that same book. He didn't.

How could anyone doubt his veracity and integrity?

Be sure to stay tooned for Part 2.

D2

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Eco/Green Movement Hijacked to Nefarious Purposes

The Rothschilds, Prince Philip Bernhard and other eugenicists with whom they are in cahoots have hijacked the Green Movement and are doing a lot of setting the tone for it.

They are using it as a cover for their plan for depopulating the earth and financing that plan by charging people a "carbon tax" for CO2 production, which they claim is the cause of global warming.

They also wish to create a world-wide religion that will ostensibly be a worship of the earth, but will, in fact, be something very different and far more ominous.

Please watch this segment of a video for an introduction.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnofms6H7zc&feature=related

I would urge you to watch the entire interview.

The part where Alex Jones asks David de Rothschild why it is there is global warming on Mars, as well as the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, and he answers that it is because they are closer to the sun than Earth would be too funny, were it not so tragically sad.

D2
Programming

While just about everyone is generally programmed, the processes are called enculturation and acculturation in pre-industrial societies but employ in post-industrial societies, specific programming is generally carried out on individuals with an IQ of at least 130 who generally possess certain hereditary backgrounds.

Blondes and redheads with blue or green eyes are most susceptible to programming. That is the real reason that they are favored by D'Powerz Dat Be and why we have all been taught that that is the height of beauty - thus setting them up as models to emulate. There's something humorous about emulating someone who is more programmed than you, thus emulating behavior that is more artificial than yours might be if you were not emulating them. D'Powerz Dat Be have weird senses of humor.

You may assume that you've been the target of specific programming if you hail from progenitors that have blonde or red hair and blue or green eyes, even if you don't - like me. I've been subjected to heavy programming, because I am a Bell, one of the 300 families. I was able to flip the finger at the vast majority of it partly because my branch of the family got far enough away from the controllers that we picked our own names and my name contains the word 'rebel' in it, as does my Paternal Grandmother's. Some of the programming I was not able to overcome and I have to fight it continuously, which saps much of my stamina. Nobody subjected to specific program gets away unscathed. Much of it is accomplished with trauma. That's they way they do things.

If, when you are faced with information that should make you think, urge you to research, compel you to pro-act, act in your own self-defense and defense of other sentient beings, you instead react with:

fear or feelings of insanity - this is the big one
depression
fatigue
feeling helpless
shutting down your emotional structure and going into (illusory) super-rational mode
feeling physically unwell
feeling spaced out or unreal
going into denial, including irrational rejection of solid evidence
feelings of aggression
ridicule
thinking: I need a drink, tranquilizer, migraine pill, to eat something...

then, tag, you're it.

But it can be overcome.

In order to find your triggers, look at your talents and abilities.

Those talents and abilities have systematically been taken out of your control, except insofar as they help make a wage slave and/or tax payer of you.

The reason that the responses that would naturally engage your talents and abilities have been programmed to have you react inappropriately should be obvious. They don't want you to be able to use your God-given gifts to defend yourselves against them or to be able to build a world that is not in keeping with their program.

Your abilities and talents were not destroyed, just put beyond your ability to access them easily, because when the time comes that they need your particular talent or ability, they want to be able to trigger you to act in their interests and in the ways they'll determine. You were programmed to react positively to certain stimuli, the most common of which are "fnords", but there are other triggers, like smells, color combinations, EM waves carrying a signal you can pick up unconsciously.

You can, if you do not have implants in your brain, as the most hapless do, fight your programming.

It's a painful, protracted battle, but it can be won.

P.S. Paradoxically, the "paranoia" of being aware of this is the sanity of overcoming the programming.

It's *a whole lot* crazier when, faced with evidence of your own immanent destruction, to react with one of the responses listed above.

Expect to feel you're losing your mind when you start to consider this material, and for quite some time thereafter.

In a sense, you are.

But that's desirable.

What you're losing is your programmed mind. We've all been taught that going outside of certain boundaries of inquiry is insanity and we feel the fear of insanity whenever we begin to inquire into what D'Powerz Dat Be don't want you to know. That is general, one-size-fits-all programming (you can imagine how sophisticated the specific stuff is).

Let yourself lose that mind. It's not worth keeping. It was never really yours to begin with. It was never who you really are.

There is someone, someone far more wonderful that you now imagine, under that personality that implanted in you through years of psychological and emotional torture.

You'll find yourself under that. The real you was not erased. It was simply suppressed. It's there.

Don't be afraid.

D2

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Global Depopulation

"If You Research Global Depopulation and Question Whether There Actually is a Plan to Kill Off Billions of People, You Keep Seeing Evidence Showing That it Exists.

Global depopulation is an elite goal.

The plan is to kill off much of the mass of humanity in order for those “deserving” Earth’s bounty to live in Utopia.

Don’t just blindly accept the above statement.

Consider what we’ve laid out below.

Then dig in deeper, research, and think!

Understand that much of what you accept for reality is an illusion.

Only you can put in the time necessary to find the truth about the world and where humankind is going.

Researching the depopulation plan will cause you concern and outrage you.

It will also open you up to possible solutions and help you avoid some of the weapons the elite try to use against you. "

Source:
http://www.fdrs.org/global_depopulation.html

The Population Control Agenda by Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.

http://www.geocities.com/lord_visionary/popcontrolagenda.htm
Global Depopulation

"If You Research Global Depopulation and Question Whether There Actually is a Plan to Kill Off Billions of People, You Keep Seeing Evidence Showing That it Exists.

Global depopulation is an elite goal.
The plan is to kill off much of the mass of humanity in order for those “deserving” Earth’s bounty to live in Utopia.
Don’t just blindly accept the above statement.
Consider what we’ve laid out below.
Then dig in deeper, research, and think!
Understand that much of what you accept for reality is an illusion.
Only you can put in the time necessary to find the truth about the world and where humankind is going.
Researching the depopulation plan will cause you concern and outrage you.
It will also open you up to possible solutions and help you avoid some of the weapons the elite try to use against you. "
Source:
http://www.fdrs.org/global_depopulation.html

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Spiritual = Spi+Ritual = Psy+Ritual

There is something that I have been meaning to write to this group.

Every time I hear or read a Jew use the word 'spiritual' as though it were the most Jewish thing in the world, as though it were the most natural thing in the world and, most often, as though it were a demonstration of the high level one is on, I cringe and I cry.

What is wrong with being spiritual? Well, what if I rewrite the word spiritual thus: spi-ritual. Do you begin to see it differently? Let's take it another step further. I'll write the word spiritual thus: psy ritual.

That is what spirituality is. It is the ritual of head spaces, head games and removing oneself from this physical level of reality and taking up residence in one's own mind.

Though it often presents itself as gentle, sensitive, evolved; spirituality leads eventually and inevitably to one place – the dark side. Spirituality is another name for avodah zara – idol worship and all idol worship involved spirituality.

None of our Prophets were spiritual. They were moral.

While it is most certainly true that at the beginning of their careers they relayed experiences of רוח HaShem being upon them, what they meant is that they became able to read into the depths of Torah. It does not mean that they became spiritual. It most certainly does not mean that HaShem is spiritual. I will say this and no more. The gematria of רוח is 214. The gematria of the word דקדוק, spelled correctly with a חירק חסר is likewise 214. The gematria of 214 is also the radical ירד. When HaShem comes to you, you are sent *down* into physicality to make the world better, not up into some rarified region wherein no tikkun is necessary. When the Prophets say the word רוח they mean that they were sent to fix the lower regions of physical reality and make a משכן, a dwelling for HaShem there and they were shown the depths of Hebrew that they needed to know in order to be able to do so. They were shown the internal secrets of the grammar of Hebrew. Once shown that they took upon themselves a lifetime of *involvement in the world* in creating and urging others to create a just world – on this plane of reality.

To be sure, in order to achieve their objective special powers and abilities were conferred upon them, but only to that purpose and that purpose alone. They were given the powers and abilities that they needed to do their jobs, no more, no less. They were not given special powers and abilities simply to have them and certainly not to be "special" or above others or this level of reality.

You have heard Rabbis teach about "spirituality". You have been told, in various forms, that this world is "nothing but illusion", "a veil" and other nonsense.

This is the introduction of avodah zara into Judaism.

The ever-increasing number of rituals in Judaism (chumrot and minhagim) is not a healthy trend. Have you ever thought about how many children die of starvation while a ritual is being performed?

Look here: "Around the world, some 26,500 children die every day.

That is equivalent to:

1 child dying every 3 seconds
18 children dying every minute
A 2004 Asian Tsunami occurring every week
An Iraq-scale death toll every 15–36 days
Almost 10 million children dying every year
Some 60 million children dying between 2000 and 2006"

Source:
http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Poverty/death/

How many children died because of poverty while you were taking part in unnecessary ritual (chumrot and minhagim)? Were you not specifically instructed *not* to add or subtract from Torah? Those unnecessary psy rituals have distracted you from your true work. They have deafened and blinded you to the agony of children. And all the while they made you feel oh, so spiritual.

And if a Rabbi comes and tells you do that which HaShem has told you not to do, to whom is your allegiance? Why do you give more credence to a Rabbi than to HaShem? Because he is flesh and blood and tangible, that's why. So, you attribute to him real authority, authority to contradict and contravene HaShem's word! The paradox of "spirituality" is that it makes you dependent on flesh and blood and unable to connect directly with HaShem because flesh and blood seems more real to you than HaShem.

There is no level of reality that the Shkhinah is not intended to take up residence in. If someone tells you that the level of reality that is the lowest level of your Soul is unworthy or unfit to be a vessel for HaShem, or "a mere illusion" and that you have to remove your consciousness to a higher level – RUN. You are being invited to create a vacuum that the Satan will be only too happy to fill.

There is no level of reality or place that it not meant to be a dwelling place of God.

To abandon a level of reality, to give up on it, to remove yourself from it as being unworthy of you is not only ego and arrogance, it leaves a place for dark forces to settle into.

Every space, every place that is abandoned by a Jew as being "too lowly" or "beyond hope" is a place that the Satan will say: "Great! I'll take it." And that place, my dear brothers and sisters is your heart and your mind.

In fact, the reason why the world is the dark place that it is today is that Jews listened to Rabbis who led them astray and became "spiritual", rather than carrying out our mission which is: פתח חרצובות רשע – loosen the shackles of injustice.

I'll put you right on the spot. If you concern yourselves more with "רוחניות" than with גשמיות, with "spirituality" (psy rituality) more than with the real world and increasing justice here, if you think that being spiritual is a sign of being greater than busying yourself with the nuts and bolts and the physical world, you are contributing to the horrors we see every day. You have let the dark side take over the space that you were intended to fix.

Beware of any Rabbi, any teacher, anyone who encourages you to be "spiritual". Wittingly or not, they are sowing the seeds of your destruction.

I have recopied this stunningly beautiful and searingly true passage before and I will likely write it again because so much blood, time, money and ink have been spilt misleading the Jewish People to think they are a "spiritual" people.

See this from the 58th Chapter of the Book of Yeshayahu:

"6 Is not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the fetters of wickedness, to undo the bands of the yoke, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke?

7 Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the naked, that thou cover him, and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh?

8 Then shall thy light break forth as the morning, and thy healing shall spring forth speedily; and thy righteousness shall go before thee, the glory of the LORD shall be thy reward.

9 Then shalt thou call, and the LORD will answer; thou shalt cry, and He will say: 'Here I am.' If thou take away from the midst of thee the yoke, the putting forth of the finger, and speaking wickedness;

10 And if thou draw out thy soul to the hungry, and satisfy the afflicted soul; then shall thy light rise in darkness, and thy gloom be as the noon-day;

11 And the LORD will guide thee continually, and satisfy thy soul in drought, and make strong thy bones; and thou shalt be like a watered garden, and like a spring of water, whose waters fail not.

12 And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places, thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called the repairer of the breach, the restorer of paths to dwell in.

It is not my way to mollycoddle people and sweet talk them. If what Yeshayahu HaNavi wrote above doesn't sound deep enough to you, spiritual enough for you, esoteric enough for you, then you do not being to know Torah, neither are you coming from a place of Kedushah. If that passage does not bring you to tears for its power and beauty and Truth, if it does not arouse in you an unquenchable desire to carry out the tikkun in this world that only you can do, you have been pre-empted by something else. You are in a place that no Jew should want to be.

If you think that "Lurianic Kabbalah" is more profound than that, or if you are more drawn to the "spirituality" of head trips like "ban" and "rishimu" and "emanations" and all of the other hallucinations in "Lurianic Kabbalah", you need to do a reality test.

And have no illusions about it, idol worship was *never* eradicated in Israel. Have no illusions about being immune It holds many Jews in a greater thrall today than it did thousands of years ago because they techniques of it have become all the more sophisticated.

D2

Monday, March 10, 2008

This piece is important not only due to its value in exposing who No'am Chomsky is, but also because it is an excellent compendium of the real issues that should be the concern of every Leftist, and would be, were it not for the untiring disinfo efforts of Chomsky.

Don't let the fact that this was first published at Rense put you off. Important information often appears on Rense's site because D'Powers Dat Be know that Rense is kooky when it comes to UFOs and such and they know that any information that appears on his site will be taken as untenable as a result.

Interspersing difficult-to-internalize, world view-shifting truths with the far-out is a common technique used to put rational people off to considering information the elites don't want considered and analyzed in depth.

Usually, where there's a reptilian or a grey on a site, there's a tidbit of fact you need to know. The Wheat and chaff principle is generally in order.

The following is wheat and I present it to you because enough damage has been done by this weasel, about which I have been writing for years.

His father, the illustrious Wm. Chomsky, true Anarchist, friend of the working person, Wobblie, scholar and gentleman, must be crying in Heaven for this disgrace of a son of his.

"Noam Chomsky: Controlled Asset Of The New World Order"Abrahamson / PREVIOUSLY CARRIED AT RENSE.COM April 6 2006

Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America’s premier dissident intellectual, a fearless purveyor of truth battling against media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.

He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly master whose logic is beyond question.

However as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse honest activists. In fact, since the 1960's Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.

His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame “America” and “corporations” while failing to examine the hidden Globalist overclass which pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction. Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky offers the solution of world government under the United Nations.In his book “The Conspirator’s Hierarchy,” Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr. Coleman’s claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky’s role as a Left gatekeeper.

Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are “nothing organizations.” When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt.

Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good for humanity.

What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World Order.

Chomsky’s role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the desired solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality of capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with the abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the major goals known of the New World Order.

Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures of Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.

The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unevenly between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations allowed to die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why was America attacked on 9-11?

In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?

Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky’s hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation.

Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.

The following analysis will show that Noam Chomsky is a deep cover agent for the New World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives become clear with a sober and honest examination.

911:

Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The “radical” Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes the staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge and participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist movements worldwide:

“If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in my opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly likely that nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I verygreatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send everyonein Washington to the death chamber, the left is unlikely to emergetriumphant.”

In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence because according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would be “the end of the Left.” Chomsky’s role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each piece of evidence individually. The following examples should suffice:

A) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19 hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the remaining 12 were trained as U.S. Air Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of the accused “religious fanatics” acted more like degenerate contract agents, as they flashed wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine, smoked weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich Florida keys.

Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence of these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes (walking through airport security does not count). Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers.

Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following:

Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that everyonein the White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what they would have had to be to try something that would have been very likely to turn into an utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded,would almost certainly have leaked, so that they would all be facing the death sentence. Possible, but not likely.

B) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart’s single engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20 minutes.

But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia. These “mock” drills, designed to give live on 9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA’s Echelon network.

Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the following:
“Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from the really serious issues.”


C) What about the document called “Operation Northwoods” signed off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men, sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included the following:

-"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."-"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation."

This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear evidence that the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the Northwoods document matters:

Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for being skeptical about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in history that even remotelyresembles what is being proposed. Of course, that does not show thatthe thesis is impossible: nothing could show that, by definition. And if someone can put together some evidence and refute the arguments as to why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be worth pursuing.

Chomsky’s role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy. When presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn’t exist. He resorts to emotional “they would never do it” appeals in order to deny the obvious. Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively engaging in disinformation.

9-11 Prior Knowledge:

Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September 11 is one thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior knowledge of the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than Michael Moore’s tepid Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of prior knowledge.

Chomsky’s position is untenable. For a man who prides himself on science and logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream media reports finds him using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one can show them photographs, videos, testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of proof is impossible. Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many government admissions of prior knowledge widely available even in the 9-11 whitewash commission report. Here is Noam Chomsky writing on government prior knowledge:
That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is flooded, daily,with information of very low credibility. In retrospect, one can sometimes pick out pieces that mean something. At the time, that'sa virtual impossibility. By arguments like this we can prove that someone blew up the White House yesterday.


If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and NORAD running drills that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings in New York, Washington DC and Virginia? Also, wouldn’t the NSA’s Echelon network have picked up the chatter?

Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network exists. This despite the NSA’s openly acknowledged ability to monitor all phone calls, emails and satellite communication with keyword software which can identify phrases and immediately begin tracking the communication. This despite their admitted bases at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and other unknown locations.Students of the intelligence world know full well that the NSA’s Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact, the NSA admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge at tops levels of the intelligence circles.

What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the flight school trainees? What about FBI agent John O’Neill’s investigation into Al-Qaeda financing which was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David Schippers who desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents like “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” call for helpful Pearl Harbor style attacks?

Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving beyond any reasonable doubt that the U.S. government had prior knowledge. But Chomsky must deny these, because his role is to mislead and distract while chastising the 9-11 truth movement.

CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission:

Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers like Chomsky has been denying the existence of the overclass which prints the money, funds and manages the wars, ships the drugs, controls entire industries, and creates the scientific propaganda which plagues society. Instead they critique mid-level minions & front corporations while speaking in glittering generalities.
In the world of Left gatekeepers, the New World Order does not exist. There are no elite plan for global government. Instead they paint the picture of a profit-motivated world in which corporations control the government. But merely blaming corporations misses the forces which own their assets, manage their resources, control their board of directors, and pull their strings.


Thus in the world of Chomsky, puppetmaster families like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Morgans do not control the financial, oil, pharmaceutical, and narcotics trade; the Oppenheimers maintain no influence over diamond, gold, iron ore, copper, uranium, titanium, and platinum markets; and we can certainly forget about investigating the European Black Nobility like the Vun Thurn und Taxis, Alba, and Saxe-Coburg dynasties.

Chomsky also vehemently denies the role of the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission in the creation and management of the wars and poverty he claims to condemn. When speaking on such “conspiracies,” he said the following:
It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, all these other things the people are racing around searching for conspiracy theories about-they're "nothing" organizations. Of course they're there, obviously rich people get together and talk to each other, and play golf with one another, and plan together-that's not a big surprise.


But these conspiracy theories people are putting their energies into have virtually nothing todo with the way the institutions actually function. (Understanding Power, 348)

Chomsky’s comments would be laughable if they weren’t polluting so many good minds. He is clearly trying to misdirect his readers way from discovering the New World Order: the interlocking web of organized crime run by the global elite, as they race toward their goals of worldwide eugenics and a technofascist world government.

Let us examine these so-called “nothing organizations” in more depth:

The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after WW II, is an organization openly sworn to destroying American national sovereignty in favor of world government. They have acted as the de-facto “secret team” in managing U.S. domestic and foreign policy, orchestrating wars like Vietnam and the first Gulf War.. Almost all executives in the CIA and State Department have been members of the CFR, whether it was Dean Rusk, Allen Dulles and Robert McNamara during Vietnam or Richard Armitage and George Tenet during the crimes of 9-11.
The CFR has acted as the dominant roundtable group pushing for a Panamerican Union by 2010 which would dissolve national borders and unite Mexico, Canada, and America under a single currency, with biometric ID cards and GPS-tracked vehicles on camera-strewn superhighways. How can Chomsky seriously claim the CFR is a “nothing organization” when their role in crafting policy is so clear? Whom is he trying to protect in denying the treasonous goals of the CFR?
Chomsky’s stonewalling on the Bilderberg raises even more suspicions. Since 1954 the Bilderberg has served as the central brain of the New World Order, the major secret gathering for Globalist agents from across the globe. Bilderberg chairmen like Prince Bernhard and David Rockefeller have pushed for total global government, eugenics population control, engineering wars, and controlling the worldwide economy. Top politicians from America and Europe also undergo a grooming process at the Bilderberg. Bill Clinton went in 1991 as Rockefeller’s personal guest, and Tony Blair attended in 1993 before becoming Prime Minister. John Kerry attended in 2000, and John Edwards did two weeks before becoming the VP nominee in 2004.


Major members of the media, such as editors from the Economist, NY Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, US News and World Report are regular attendees. Yet they rarely, if ever, mention the proceedings, sworn to secrecy by their globalist masters.

Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major media outlets like the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning for a one-world currency, bank, and army. Articles in Reuters and the Financial Times of London have admitted the existence of the Bilderberg, their grooming of politicians, and their secret plans for world governance. If these mainstream media reporters can admit the major role of the Bilderberg in shaping world affairs, why can’t Chomsky? Why is he holding back?

Simlarly, how can Chomsky seriously ignore the role of the Trilateral Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski? This is the same Brzezinski who helped direct the first CIA funds to bin Laden, and in his book Between Two Ages called for a technotronic society with a microchipped population. The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to control the economy through closer European-Japanese-American cooperation.

They operate much like the CFR, counting the worlds top elites, politicians, corporate executives, and media barons as members. They have been instrumental in creating the destructive “free trade” agreements that are destroying America’s economy and national sovereignty in order to usher in world governance.

Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable credentials, also links the Trilateral Commission to the international narcotics trade, the $500 billion-plus racket from heroin and cocaine alone which helps fund the Globalist’s house of cards.

What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission a “nothing organization?” Is it because they echo his goal of a world government? Or are there darker forces at work?
When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence, Chomsky’s claims are exposed as nothing more than spurious lies and denial.


Federal Reserve:

Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in America and the Third World, he has never spoken publicly on the role of the Federal Reserve, nor their European master, the Bank of England. Therefore most Leftist activists are unaware of the roles played by these privately owned bank cartels which print worthless fiat currency out of thin air.

Since its secret formation at Jekyll Island in 1910, and subsequent illegal passage during the Wilson administration, the Federal Reserve has held the American economy hostage: creating inflation and boom & bust cycles through managed money supply and interest rates.

Furthermore every dollar printed is merely debt charged to the federal government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to print a $100 bill, the U.S. government fits the bill for the full $100 to the private Fed.

The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild interests has eluded the “radical” Chomsky. Furthermore he does not discuss the proven role of the Fed in creating recessions and depressions in order to purchase assets at a fraction of their value.

Chomsky systematically ignores the role of the fiat currency system which drives down wages, inflates prices, and puts the American economy under the iron claw of a few elite families. Since the dollar is the base currency for worldwide trade and the current economic house of cards, shouldn’t these topics be discussed?

Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into his ideology. After all, one of the key planks in the Marxist and Fabian socialist agenda is a managed central bank in order to control the economy. Or perhaps he fears discussion of the Fed would expose the real hidden hand that secretly manages the world economy. For him it is easier to blast the front corporations and low-level grocery boys.

CIA:

If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11, should it be any surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the CIA? When asked about the links between the CIA and bin Laden, and the CIA’s overt support of the Taliban, Chomsky wrote the following:
“CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate) or the Taliban (also not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me remotely relevant.”


How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply ignoring the documented evidence of CIA funding for the “freedom fighters” known as al-Qaeda, totaling over $6 billion. The cozy CIA/al-Qaeda relationship continued through the Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling Kosovo Liberation Army.

Chomsky also denies the mainstream reports from UK and French newspapers about two top CIA agents meeting with Osama bin Laden for over ten days in July 2001 while he received dialysis at the American Hospital in Dubai. Why is Chomsky afraid of the evidence showing bin Laden remains little more than a CIA mole? And what about those meetings between Taliban leaders, oil executives, and Bush administration officials from January to August 2001 to discuss building an oil and gas pipeline for Unocal?

But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique the CIA, he absolves the agency of any responsibility for its actions, from Nazi origins via Project Paperclip to heinous mind control experiments like MK ULTRA. This horrific period in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in understanding the New World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who sees the CIA as an innocent victim of White House orders:.

Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of alot of these conspiracies; we have a ton of information about it, and as I read the information,the C.I.A. is basically just an obedient branch of theWhite House. I mean sure, the C.I.A. has done thingsaround the world- but as far as we know, it hasn'tdone anything on its own.

There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know of any-that the C.I.A. is some kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on its own doing things. What the record shows is that theC.I.A. is just an agency of the White House, whichsometimes carries out operations for which theExecutive branch wants what's called "plausibledeniability"; in other words, if something goes wrong,we don't want it to look like we did, those guys inthe C.I.A. did it, and we can throw some of them tothe wolves if we need to. That's basically the roleof the C.I.A., along with mostly just a collection ofinformation. (Chomsky, “Understanding Power”)

Like all of Chomsky’s claims, this one is based on emotion, conjecture, and opinion. He does not cite any specifics, knowing full well that his fawning minions will accept his word as gospel.
Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat bureaucrats, acting as grocery boys for their master President. According to him, the CIA does not carry out secret projects on their own, and if accused of such, are innocent.


JFK Assassination/CIA role:

Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone assassin and magic bullet theory in the assassination of JFK? From his emergence as a guru of the Left in the late 60's, Chomsky has belittled anyone researching the anomolies stemming from the official story and Warren Commission cover-up. According to him, any examination is a complete waste of time:
The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the moststriking case. I mean, you have all these peopledoing super-scholarly intensive research, and tryingto find out just who talked to whom, and what's theexact contours were of this supposed high-level conspiracy-it's all complete nonsense. As soon as youlook into the various theories, they always collapse,there's just nothing there. But in many places, theleft has just fallen apart on the basis of these sheercults. (Chomsky, Understanding Power)


Chomsky’s position puts him in the less than 15% of Americans who believe Oswald was the lone shooter. For such a self-proclaimed “anarchist” radical, Chomsky’s trust in Warren Commission’s official story seems akin to a child’s belief in Santa Claus.The facts of course, tell a different story. While far from perfect man, Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces that took over after his death. He began withdrawing 5,000 CIA “advisers” from Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen Dulles and Richard Bissel; disbanded the CIA and handed over covert operations to the State Department; ordered the creation of a silver-backed government currency to break the Federal Reserve monopoly; turned down the Operation Northwoods plan to engineer false flag terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and refused to invade Cuba and launch a full scale nuclear war during the Missile Crisis, a plan favored by hawks like General Curtis LeMay.

Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency because it would expose te shadow government takeover after his assassination.

What about Chomsky’s claims that the CIA never acts as a rogue elephant? Do they hold up?

MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip:

Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind control programs known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots. This program alone shows how the CIA was indeed a rogue elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of propaganda, brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.

In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman began a covert plan to smuggle top Nazi SS officers, scientists, and propagandists into America. Those same war criminals quickly became the front line for the postwar U.S. intelligence machine. Reinhard Gehlen, one of Hitler’s top intelligence chiefs, led postwar European intelligence for the CIA, becoming the darling of head honcho Allen Dulles.

Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the Vatican, and sponsored by the CIA, Gehlen set up “rat lines” which smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi criminals into South and Central America. Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin Bormann and Josef Mengele among others owed their freedom to this program.

Those same men would later aid CIA coups in Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Brazil and other countries. After all, they were veteran experts: early Gehlen projects had included rigging elections in Italy and France. By 1955, more than 760 German scientists had been became U.S. citizens, many specializing in black research projects. This growing cabal of Nazi doctors found a happy marriage with the control freak elitists infesting the NSA, CIA, and black operations government.

These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.

Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates, used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.

In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnaped from American streets and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind control.

Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which usually fetch over $300 a piece.

Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister projects? Why does he claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the White House, when the record proves that Eisenhower and Kennedy had little, if any knowledge of MK ULTRA? Simply put: Why is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?

Elite Child Sex Rings:

The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further mention (although Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice President Bush was caught having 15 year-old call boy prostitutes visiting the White House late at night. The credit cards records to prove it were splashed across the front page of the Washington Times: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry Ensnares VIP's with Reagan, Bush Sr."

Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided in his hotel with piano wire before he could testify. Book like "The Franklin Coverup" by John DeCamp have further proven the links between the CIA and Army intelligence to the elite sex slavery rings. Cases of like the "The Finders" in Washington DC, where customs agents discovered a CIA warehouse full of child porn and satanic torture, stand as yet further evidence.

In the forrmer Yugloslavia, CIA front company Dyncorp has been convicted of operating in the human slave trade and using their C-130's to ship many of the 200,000 women and children smuggled out every year. Furthermore, mainstream news outlets have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers assisting the sex trade in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Balkans.

Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky has never discussed the elite sex trade. This is an issue so shocking, so paradigm-altering, that his Leftist followers would no longer trust their loving mother government, and that is the last thing Chomsky wants. After all, if the Leftists knew that top level politicians are actually pedophiles practicing satanic ritual abuse, they would no longer trust the savior world government. The absence of Chomsky and the Left on the suffering of these children speaks volumes about their true moral character and motives.

MK ARTICHOKE/ MK NAOMI:

Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth culture and attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the latter perfected by Dr. Delgado. Adjunct programs like MK NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on genetically engineered viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on American citizens. Common experiments included testing biological agents and atomic weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally handicapped, people in subways, and even whole towns; putting cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and exposing pregnant women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These experiments have been documented as continuing into the 1980's and likely still continue today.

Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because it would awaken his readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S. government will murder its own citizens and soldiers, killing hundreds of thousands of unwitting subjects simply for political gain. After all, if they would feed radiated breakfast cereal to thousands of retarded children, would these same parasitic elites not also kill more than 2,800 Americans on September 11?

Fluoride:

Of course MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It was around the time of its inception, in the 1950's, that the U.S. government began adding sodium fluoride to tap water in massive quantities.. Should we be shocked? After all, the first people to use the deadly neurotoxin were the Nazis, who found it pacified the concentration camp prisoners. Now thanks to imported Nazi doctors helping our friendly neighborhood CIA, American citizens could enjoy the same privilege as those in Hitler's camps.

Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride, nor the lead and arsenic used in water as silent weapons of pacification. As a scientist, he is apparently uninterested in sodium fluoride's proven link to cancer, leukemia, osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.
So should we be surprised that he never writes about the deadly poison aspartame found in thousands of products? Or genetically modified foods and growth hormones which destroy immune systems while causing blood disorders and swelling of the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly microwave radiation leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to published BBC reports) altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers which pulse deadly ELF radiation across America?


Rockefeller Pharma Cartel:

The Nazi doctors who didn’t end up in American intelligence found cushy jobs in the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck and Eli-Lilly. Chomsky never discusses the history of these firms; nor the Rockefeller control over the American Medical Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted vaccines and brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI’s (Prozac, Zoloft, etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin pills pimped out to helpless children.

These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal tendencies and added depression to the poor kids gobbling them like Flintstone’s chewables, all at the advice of their pill-pusher death merchant doctors. Meanwhile Chomsky stays true to form, ignoring these matters and instead calling for socialized, Federally-controlled healthcare which would further subsidize the pharma cartel. This is just another example of his bait and switch tactics, a sloppy mess of disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.

Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative:

Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from psychiatric community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers and Tavistock Institute, which seek to define every neurosis as a mental illness in order to push more drugs. Bush has signed the New Freedom Initiative to forcibly psychologically test all K-12 students in public schools, screen them for “mental illnesses,” and force the children to take the recommended drugs.

This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma cartel, with GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck and others investing millions in buy-offs and lobbying. But news of this extraordinary Stalinist plan never graced the pages of Chomsky's editorials, nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the Progressive, and DemocracyNow. Perhaps this is because the New Freedom Initiative fits into their goal of government-controlled socialized health care.

The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin’s wildest dreams, is just a small part of the eugenics agenda; a dominant Globalist goal which Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky has never written about the sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor the role of it's former chief, Dr. Ewen Cameron, the aforementioned MK ULTRA villain and CIA child programmer.

Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as population control, abortion legalization, poisonous vaccinations, and stem cell research find their most vocal advocates on the far Left of the managed political debate. Leftist college majors like sociology advocate programs like parental licensing by the state, state-controlled child care, and Chinese style childbirth laws with forced sterilization as a penalty.

Leftists call for more vaccinations in the Third World despite the admittedly tainted vaccines used by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. All of this is indicative of an infiltrated movement, a Left deeply penetrated by Globalist agents driving activists into unwittingly championing the Brave New World.

Population Control:

Population control by any means necessary is a major, some would say the major goal of the New World Order, perhaps even paramount to their goal of a cashless society control grid with microchipped slaves. The chief architects of population control are Bilderberg elitists like David and Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, Ted Turner, Alexander Haig, and Cyrus Vance. Their Malthusian nightmare requires killing 90% of the “useless eaters” through war, genetically engineered viruses, and engineered starvation. Declassified documents like NSM 200 and Global 2000 lay the plans out with cold precision.

Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such depopulation methods. In Chomsky’s book “Understanding Power,” a collection of his talks with activists, a crowd member asks about population control, to which Chomsky responds:
If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the human race isn’t going to survive much longer...Yeah, population control is another issue where it doesn’t matter if you do it, everybody has to do it. It’s like traffic: I mean you can’t make driving a car survivable by driving well yourself; there has to be kind of a social contract involved, otherwise it won’t work. (61)


Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral high ground, but then advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite roundtable groups like the Bilderberg and Club of Rome. How can Chomsky claim to be an advocate for the Third World while simultaneously pushing for the managed murder agenda favored by Henry Kissinger?

Gun Control:

Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has been pushing for unconstitutional gun control agenda through their publications like The Nation, Z Magazine, The Progressive, and their internet kin at DemocracyNow! & Indymedia. It is a great achievement of propaganda when the supposed radicals “opposing Bush” call for a completely disarmed American populace and inflated budget for BATF thugs in ski masks. Chomsky mock s those who support the Constitutionally endowed right to bear arms. In fact, he says it doesn’t exist:
It’s pretty clear that, taken literally, the Second Amendment doesn'tpermit people to have guns. But laws are never taken literally, including amendments to the Constitution or constitutional rights. Laws permit whatthe tenor of the times interprets them as permitting.” (Secrets, Lies, and Democracy)


Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are a proper way to respond to government tyranny. He responds as follows: As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's outlandish. First of all, this is not a weak Third World country. If people have pistols, the government has tanks. If people get tanks, the government has atomicweapons. There's no way to deal with these issues by violent force, even if you think that that's morally legitimate.
Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make the country more benign. They're going to make it more brutal, ruthlessand destructive. So while one can recognize the motivation that liesbehind some of the opposition to gun control, I think it's sadly misguided. (Secrets, Lies and Democracy)


It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian socialists in the Democratic party. But to have the supposed “fringe radicals” saying there is no second amendment and advocating gun seizures is remarkable. And because of globalist infiltration of the left, this policy once favored by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and other mass murderers has found a comfortable home. Hence it has become common to hear activists protesting the Iraq quagmire while simultaneously calling for gun control.

Environmental Front Groups:

As masters of propaganda, the Globalists have uses their Left Gatekeepers to push eugenics and population control as necessary for the environment. This has been accomplished through the phony environmental movement and Peak Oil fabrications. The Club of Rome, a globalist front group created in 1968, immediately began calling for population reduction under the guise of environmentalism.

Other fronts like the World Wildlife Fund, managed by the aforementioned Prince Philip, vocally push for population control while seizing large swaths of land for “Mother Earth.” Other pet projects such as the Kyoto Protocol, which would give the UN total control of energy resources, have floundered.

Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad Black, Shell chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug dealer Henry Keswick.

Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real environmental pollution problems to push for a fascist takeover by a world government. Much like the ideas discussed in the Report From Iron Mountain, he uses the threat of global warming to justify totalitarian control:
Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effects has been way understimated, and that the catastrophic effects are actually going to set in 10 years from now, and not 100 years from now or something. Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today, we’d probablyhave a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing to it, because that would be the only method for survival that anyone could think of. I’d even agree to it, because there’s just no other alternatives right now. (Understanding Power, 388)


Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating a fascist takeover because the ends justify the means. This is classic problem-reaction-solution programming, as he points to the real threat of pollution and then offers the solution of tyranny

Peak Oil:

As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded and amplified by Globalist oil, banking, and drug cartels, with specific help from the Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF, along with other phony NGO’s like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace consistently call for population reduction. Additionally these groups push the flat earth thesis of “Peak Oil,” predicting that oil supplies will soon run out and of course...require massive worldwide population reductions.
Chomsky posted an entry called “Peak Oil” on his blog in June, 2004, writing the following: “The basic theory is incontrovertible. The only questions have to do with timing and cost.”


Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr, Chomsky said the following of Peak Oil: There's another side to this, there's a sense in which it'sadvantageous if the oil peak is earlier. The reason why is it willcompel the world, primarily the U.S. here, to move toward something like sustainable energy.If there's unbounded amounts of hydrocarbons, we're just going to destroy the environment for human life or most biological life, so theearlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be catastrophic,it could also be beneficial.

The “beneficial” aspects Chomsky discusses are likely the resulting population control and starvation that would ensue from such a shortage.

But in reality oil is abiotic and constantly regenerating. This, while huge wells go untapped in Russia, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria, Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Alaska, Venezuela, Bolivia, Norway, and the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, refinery capacity has been deliberately shut down by the oil oligopoly in order to create artificial supply shortages. Market prices are controlled by the Anglo-American cartel and they intend to use this as a vehicle for engineered crises. At this years Bilderberg meeting Henry Kissinger reportedly predicted $100 a barrel oil within a year. The only possible result is a complete worldwide depression.

It is within the “radical” Left that horror stories of diminishing oil find their home. Even within the 9-11 truth movement, authors like Mike Ruppert and Nafeez Ahmed have attempted to attach Peak Oil as the reason for government engineering of 9-11 and the wars in the Middle East. By polluting the activist movements with Peak Oil lies, the Globalists have created an army of strong advocates for $5 a gallon gasoline.

Project for the New American Century (PNAC)

Another triumph of Chomsky’s disinfo campaign has been the active denial of the The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neocon group that published radical statements calling for world war, population control, and a worldwide police state back in 2000. The signatures on the documents included Dick Cheney and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Eliot Abrams.

It was Zakheim who previously ran Systems Planning Inc., which made remote-control software for commercial airliners. Also as comptroller of the Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of taxpayer money without explanation. Yet his corruption was not singular; after Bush took his figurehead position in the stolen election of 2000, all of the PNAC radicals became the architects of 9-11 and purveyors of pre-war lies about Iraq.

Their infamous “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” document, produced in 2000 before 9-11, reads like prophecy, calling for theater wars against Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. They also admitted that "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." September 11, anyone?

They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large sectors of the human population. The document states: "[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC cabal, whose mad plans for world domination read like the lost chapters of Mein Kampf?


If the Left Gatekeepers won’t discuss these published documents, how can we expect them to research the true history of AIDS and the potential emerging avian flu? Should we be surprised when they fail to mention the 60 plus dead microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading researchers in emerging viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an expose of the heavy metals and biological agents in chemtrails?

Isreal/Zionists:

Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists linked to the Likud party in Israel, who presented similar plans to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 (“Policy for a Clean Break”).

Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by followers for his books like “The Fateful Triangle” which detail many Israeli war crimes. Furthermore he often criticizes the Isreali-linked network dominating U.S. foreign policy. But as always, Chomsky again avoids the hardcore issues, instead speaking in glittering generalities.

For example, he remains mute on the “Office of Special Plans,” the ad-hoc nerve center of pre-war Iraq propaganda, run of Cheney’s office. It was here that Zionist moles like Paul Wolfowitz, Larry Franklin, Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, and Richard Perle cooked up phony WMD threats, links 9-11, and collaboration between secular Iraq and Al-Qaeda.

Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud party and intelligence syndicate Mossad, operated a two-way spy network; just as manufactured propaganda flowed from Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S. secrets on Iran secretly floated into Sharon’s war cabinet.

In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia don of all lobbying cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top level AIPAC officers like Steve Rosen often acted as a go–between, then using that same fake intelligence to strong-arm the Congress where they control both sides..
All parties mentioned, from Rosen to Franklin, are now under investigation from the FBI and Justice Department for the aforementioned crimes. Major articles in the Washington Post now admit Franklin, working with Feith and Cambone, was passing secrets to Israel through AIPAC. Chomsky has never spoken publically about any of these topics, and certainly not the Mossad involvement in false-flag terror events like the USS Liberty and connections to 9-11.


Vote Fraud:

When he isn’t busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11 or the crimes of the CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying the vote fraud of 2004, which ushered in another term for the neocon dictatorship. Chomsky often brags that he does not vote in presidential elections, noting that both sides are owned by corporations. But he has openly denied the role of electronic voting fraud in 2000 and the more prominent example of 2004. In 2004, exit polls in Ohio and Florida showed John Kerry winning by a comfortable margin, but mysteriously numbers showed a Bush victory.

The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State in Ohio, Ken Blackwell, managed Bush’s campaign in the state, much like Katherine Harris did in Florida during 2000. Diebold, the company which makes most of the electronic voting machines, is crawling with former CIA and NSA members and used convicted felons to design their software. The Diebold CEO Walden O’Dell is a Bush Pioneer and wrote in a GOP fundraising letter that he was “committed to delivering electoral votes to the President.”

The Diebold code is private and has been exposed as being easily hacked by Bev Harris at BlackBoxVoting.org. In North Carolina and Georgia, machines were throwing out 5,000 block votes for Bush without explanation. But none of this seems to interest Chomsky, who finds the accusations of vote fraud to be without merit: I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate count in itself is arandom effect. As for collusion, yes, there are concerns, but concerns arenot evidence. The problem that concerns you may or may not be real, but inmy view, even if we take the worst case scenario, it is still marginal --just as the Florida chads were marginal in the 2000 elections. I know of noreason to suppose that electronic voting will have more than a random effect.

Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of electronic voting because it would awaken too many people to the total bankruptcy of the system. It is important that college activists at Berkeley think their vote for Ralph Nader counted. If they knew the entire game was rigged like a Don King boxing match, too many illusions would break down.

World Government:

Chomsky plays the Left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a false dialectic of the evil American imperialist as the antagonist aggressor, contrasted by the savior UN world government as the benevolent deux ex machina.

This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist U.S. against the godly UN fits the classic MO of “poisoning the well.” Essentially, Chomsky acts as a re-direct agent: he acknowledges many crimes of American foreign policy and then offers world government and international law as the solution.

The Globalists have long been masters of such a paradigm. In the early part of the 20th century, the same Wall Street bankers crafted the doctrines of Communism. While posing as a workers’ liberation theology, it pushed for a central bank, world army, world court, world government, and the abolition of religion, private property, and the nation state.

Like other “anarchist” agent provacatuers such as John Zerzan (who helped train violent mobs to ruin the Seattle WTO protests in 1999), Chomsky has called for the elimination of private property. He argues, "that some form of council communism is the natural form of revolutionary socialism in an industrial society.”

In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination of the nation-state and national sovereignty to be replaced by a one world government: “Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary would be a breakdown of the nation-state system- because I think that’s not a viable system. It’s not necessarily the natural form of human organization.” (314)

Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines, is essentially endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the breakdown of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.

Noam Chomsky is a shameless world government pimp, and has heaped lavish praise on men like Bertrand Russell who helped design the New World Order. Lucky for him, Chomsky has been publicly rewarded for his faithful service to the UN cause. In February 2004 he received the Award of Excellence at the UN Correspondents Association Club in New York. Previous winners included Globalist assets like Mikhail Gorbachev.

UNESCO:

Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is it any surprise he supports some of the worst UN programs? U.N.E.S.C.O, the nightmare UN vehicle posing as an “aid” organization, finds a strong advocate with Chomsky.

Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller clan, U.N.E.S.C.O projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda into American schools and with the goal of eventually merging the curriculum with Mexico and Canada in the proposed Panamerican Union; and seizing control of huge swaths of American federal lands through "UN World Heritage" sites. The first U.N.E.S.C.O chief Julian Huxley said during his tenure in 1948: "The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent... It can stress… the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world political organization… Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…to help the emergence of a single world culture."

But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of the UN, endorses the goals of U.N.E.S.C.O wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil conservatives who question its motives:
U.N.E.S.C.O-because it’s working for the Third World-we practically put them out of business.


The United States launched a huge propaganda campaign against U.N.E.S.C.O. in the 1970's and Eighties- it was full of outrageous lies, totally fabricated, but nevertheless it sufficed to eliminatethe Third World orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and make it stop doing thingsit was doing around the Third World, like improving literacy andhealth care and so on. (86)

PROPAGANDA:

Many credit Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” with being the premier study of government propaganda. In Leftist circles it is hailed as a Bible, a rite of passage for any true activist to understand the system. But again, Chomsky’s work, while appearing radical, is actually gatekeeper disinfo.

Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that newspapers diminish American war crimes while exaggerating those of foreign governments. Such a point is easy to prove, and he does so in his own droll and methodical method.

Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant in the room: direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and journalists beginning in the 1950's under Operation Mockingbird.

Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program which covertly put major publishing, newspaper, and media outlets, as well as thousands of individual reporters under direct agency control. Agents included Ben Bradlee at Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life, and Arthur Sulzberger of The New York Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington Post, and Joseph Harrison Christian Science Monitor.

Shouldn’t this a significant development for a historian authoring an honest study of propaganda? After all who is to say that this program doesn’t still continue? The Bush administration has admitted spending hundreds of millions on fake newscasts and paying individual reporters like Armstrong Williams to push talking points in newspapers. What about the times they haven’t been caught? Exactly how many mainstream commentary and news outlets work with the CIA and White House?

Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly news on ABC, CBS, and NBC are almost exactly the same, while Newsweek, Time, and the New York Times push the elitist agenda on cue (as seen most prominently in the run up to the war in Iraq).

Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between the Bilderberg Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn’t this concern the so-called radical anarchist, when media editors attend secret meetings calling for eugenics, world government, and a cashless society control grid?

Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek, Economist, Washington Post, New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news outlet in between have attended the world government meetings.

Furthermore, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly calls for a Panamerican Union and the end of American national sovereignty? The CFR counts amongst its members major editors, owners, and journalists in media outlets from PBS to CBS, CNN to News Corp., New Republic to U.S. News and World Report.

Aren’t these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda Chomsky identifies? In “Manufacturing Consent,” Chomsky takes limited aim at an easy target. But he fails to dig deeper and examine the actual reasons why the propaganda permeates the mainstream media opinion. Clearly the influence of the CIA, CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House have turned major media outlets into little more than docile commissars. Additionally, the interlocking interests of media owners with the military industrial complex have served to sway content even further.

Chomsky’s “classic” study is little more than a limited hangout project. He is merely shooting the messengers, blaming journalistic “bias” while failing to follow the trail of money, power, corruption, and black propaganda. Instead, he identifies some passive propaganda and is hailed as a brilliant analyst and purveyor of truth by the Leftist minions. But his true achievement is ignoring the reasons behind the lies, as he executes a masterful bait and switch tactic. Is it a coincidence that Chomsky’s co-author for “Manufacturing Consent,” Edward Herman, has also denied any government complicity in 9-11?

While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected the art.

CONCLUSIONS:

Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devises for the Globalists because they help define the limits of the false left-right paradigm. Much like David Horowitz, a former Leftist, currently does for the radical Right. Is it a surprise that he edited a book called “The Anti-Chomsky Reader?” It should only be natural since they both serve the same role of gatekeeper.
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele Malkin, William Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right Gatekeepers. They criticize the failures of liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush worshipping, illegal wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our Constitutional rights for “security.” In doing so they pollute the movement and help marginalize true conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups like Gun Owners of America.


Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write about the crimes of American imperialism and then call for population control, gun control, global government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave New World society.


The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act of appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement and murder. In all likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda scientists at the venerable Tavistock institute in London and adjuncts of the CIA’s Mockingbird program; clearly the Left’s denial of 9-11 truths has been too coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.

In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.

All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices. Thus at either extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky to Horowitz, one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global government. This is the genius of the New World Order, their complete castration of free political will through carefully managed propaganda agents. The rest of the media jackals serve as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and power hungry sycophants with massive egos and more concern for their career than the truth.

Noam Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper associates must be actively exposed for their role in the propaganda system. For nearly 40 years since they infiltrated the activist movement, these Left gatekeepers have made the activist movements impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective. Thus instead of understanding their enslavement, many activists end up calling for tighter chains by echoing Chomsky’s calls for gun control, population control, and a world government under the UN. They end up critiquing the Iraq disaster without seeing government involvement in 9-11 and the CIA/MI-6/Mossad creation known as Al-Qaeda.

Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly push real activists into dead-end solutions. Until they are vocally exposed, the Left will continue to remain a managed asset of the New World Order."

Source: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/060406Chomsky.htm

Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!