Saturday, February 15, 2014


The selfsame sectarian and factionalist tendencies which urged
S├ębastien Faure and Voline (Vsevolod Mikhailovich Eikhenbaum) to express the concept of ANARCHIST SYNTHESIS (or ORGANIC ANARCHY, that is: the idea the Anarchism must be characterised by the same creative dynamic, ever-changing equilibria that characterise Life itself) in the early 20th Century have reemerged today.

It is, then, apposite that we may review their monumental theoretical achievement – the Synthesis of all that is worthy and good in the various streams of authentic Anarchy so that we may progress toward the actualization thereof.

Please note: Though the Synthesis is comprehensive and maximally generous of Spirit and mind; there are Anarchist tendencies that it does not recognize as genuine and well-intentioned, to wit: The Platform and Anarcho-Capitalism.

The Synthesis which Faure and Voline envisioned was a Synthesis of three complementary, supplementary and necessarily-existing moments in Anarchism. They are:
1) Anarcho-Syndicalism
2) Anarcho-Collectivism/Communism
3) Anarcho-Individualism
Today, we would include as  mutually compatable with these various Moments of Anarchism such ideas as Anarcho-Feminism, Anarcho-Primitivism (which can exist in the same world with various Anarchist hi-tech Communities) and , in fact, all forms of Anarchism that do not contradict the above Principles.
However, let not the disingenuous include themselves. Let us not be deflected from our course by either factionalism or specious argumentation. "Anarcho-Capitalism" is a misnomer and disingenuous. The Platform is naught be Bolshevism rephrased in Anarchist terms so that the poison might be swallowed and then corrode us from within.

Faure, Voline and their contemporaries did not have to grapple with an issue that has become pervasive and invasive in our times. That issue is the deliberate creation of an effete, vapid, spoilt Middle Class that demands instant, cheap and easily-gained satisfaction, particularly among young people. In their time, most Americans and Europeans alike were serious-minded and they possessed the ballast of common sense and responsibility. They had to in order to survive. Today, we must struggle with 'attitude', vapidity, reduced attention span and a generalized light-headedness that was very carefully, and perfidiously, cultivated because the "elite" understands that such minds are not disposed to consider matters seriously or deeply and are apt to quickly find an equilibrium in the simple, diluted and degraded when presented with new, possibly socially-arousing, ideas.
The cultivation of snarky light-headedness among the Middle Class was found to be less bloody, yet far more effective, in preventing unity among groups that might effect social change than the internecine struggles that were fomented in the past to undermine social Movements.
There was no "Spectacle" at the beginning of the 20th Century. We must fight mightily against that phenomenon today. Paradoxically emptiness is, in our times, our most obdurate and obstinate obstacle.

These caveats having been expressed, let us, in the Spirit of Solidarity and  Love, consider now the principles of SYNTHESIS (or ORGANIC) ANARCHISM.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

Wednesday, February 12, 2014


"Zionism" is not the vision of Tziyyon of the Hebrew Prophets.
The Anglicization of the Hebrew concept Tziyyon was used to fool the Jews into thinking that they and the British were on the same page.

This is Zionism:

Therefore, the Zionists are the Germanic-British Imperialists and those living in their colonies, NOT the Israelis.
The Americans, the Canadians, the South Africans, the Australians, the New Zealanders ARE THE ZIONISTS.

Let's start using the term Zionist correctly. It's more likely YOU than the Jews living in Israel.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

Tuesday, February 11, 2014


Disambiguation about "Zionism" is in order. I've seen comments from people who think they're very enlightened when they say that you can't blame all of the Jews for the actions of the Zionists and I just shake my head in sorrow at the depth of the benightedness, total lack of self-reflection or critique and hypocrisy.

"Zionism" is not what we Hebrews call Tziyyonut, which is the vision of our Prophets.
"Zionism" is Germanic (including British of course) Imperialism.

The Jews are, in fact, Indigenous to the Land of Israel and we have every right to be here. In fact, we have no right to be in any of the European Imperialist colonies, to wit: The US, Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand - to mention some of the worst offenders - just as the Europeans have no right to be there.

The effect of Zionism is that New York City is 0.1% Native. Now that, good Europeans, is real Zionism. Decry it much?

The carefully crafted conflation of "Zionism" with Tziyyonut is intended to keep your attention off the fact that those who are not Indigenous and are living in any of the European colonies are the Zionist Occupiers . As the second link shows, the Celts are represented among the Zionists.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel