Ontological Anarchy

I realized that the world we are living in, characterized such as it is by central governments, originates in and is fueled by our insistence upon viewing the world as though we are at the center of our consciousness and all others and else are viewed from that vantage point.

When We come to see ourSelves as *both* beings in and of ourSelves: real, actual, whole and with Our own integrity but also as aspects of all others, We will likewise create a decentralized world system.

Nullifying the ego enough to be able to dissolve into seeing oneSelf as an aspect of others, from their point of view, does not bring about obliteration of the Self. We simply become able to be both actual and perceived, real and a perception. Think particle and wave if it helps.

When We realize ourSelves as aspects of all the Others, We see around Us, We realize that any thought that arises in Our minds, any moment that arises in our Hearts, likewise arises in all Others - to varying extents of immediate awareness.
The thinker of the highest, purest, most loving thoughts, the originator of the tenderest and most sincere feelings is manifesting on the highest levels of reality and is broadcasting on orders of magnitude higher than those who hatch evil schemes.
So, let's pay attention to the Beautiful and strengthen it with Our Collective Attention. Let's share Our best thoughts and Our purest feelings One with Another and We will banish the world that was created when the majority of us were ego-centered quite naturally and as a matter of course.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

YES. I'M CRAZY ENOUGH TO THINK I CAN CHANGE THE WORLD.

Yes. I'm crazy enough to think I can change the world. And when I say change the world, I don't mean just create a better socio-economic structure within the world such as it is, while leaving the "laws of nature" intact. When I say change the world, I mean to change the entire nature of being. My idea of a New World Order is just that - a more liberal Existence, a more just Creation. AND I'm crazy enough to think you can change the world too.

I'd go so far as to say that so long as we accept the "laws of nature" such as they present themselves to our consciousness, we are milling water when we try to institute radically better systems. The currently accepted "laws of nature" are weighted against us. They favor enslavement.

Those really aren't laws of nature at all. They are the result of our how our minds and moral structures work. It is we who are currently making reality line up around us thus.

To change the world, we must change our moral structures significantly and jettison our preconceived notions about, well, just about everything.

The rejection of the current "laws of nature", based as they are on low-grade morality which we both attribute to all of nature and which determine how we attract phenomena to us is what I call Mystical Anarchy.

Because most Anarchists reject all mysticism, they are never going to get a better socio-economic structure of the ground. Their rejection of laws extend only to the rejection of those laws they realize are man-made, not realizing that ALL laws are man-made. We cannot artificially transplant a just socio-economic system on a reality that is reflecting our own malevolence. We have to transmute that malevolence to benevolence and then ALL laws will be on a higher, more liberal, more elastic level.

I'm also convinced that the gateway to breaking out of our attachment to these laws is finding the courage to stop payment of all loans and taxes and unjust charges.

That we cannot do alone. We have to organize.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

קריאה למהפכה

When They Tell You that You Have No Right to The Land, No Right to the Covenant, No Claims on Eternity

When they say to you: "You have no right to the Land after 2000 years! –or- "Your Covenant has ended!" –or-Your Tradition may have been relevant long ago, but it has no relevance to modern times!", what they are saying is:
"I am so blind that all I perceive is that you look European. I cannot see the Hebrew in you beneath the outer features. Had I sustained as many rapes and assimilating unions due to brainwash as your People have, there would be no trace of my Original Identity in me. I cannot conceive of surviving such a protracted Test.
I have not been found worthy and fit of eternal trust. I cannot keep, or even imagine, fealty forever. I could not keep up my end of an Eternal Covenant. I cannot be relied upon without end. After a finite amount of time, under finite pressure; I would give up what is most precious to me. I refuse to imagine anyone being found so morally sound as to remain loyal to their Promise forever. Therefore, you cannot possibly be a Party to a Covenant that is Eternal."
Don't listen to their characteristic shrieks, with their strident and shrill tone at all Israel. Don't listen at all. They are saying that, though they have been offered Eternity; they have chosen empherality. They have chosen to perish and perish they will by their own indictment. They too shall pass away and our Covenant will endure forever.
Those who have been kind and loving enough to themselves to deem themselves worthy of Eternity will see and honor it and protect it in us as we will in them.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

Gay Marriage Rights

Oh, yeah. Absolutely. Everyone should have equal rights to have their monogamous-only relationships regulated by the state and, in the event that they're not deliriously happy with that set-up; they should have equal rights to be put through the Inquisition of the divorce courts and generate more revenues for the System.

The same people who pushed the formulation of "Feminism" (Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA and Aaron Russo said shortly before he died that one of the Rockefellers told him they were behind the "Feminist movement) in order to get women into the working world and have children totally vulnerable to the system from infancy, are now running this "progressive" idea.

Emma Goldman, a woman so essentially free that women of today can't hold a candle to her, warned women not to vote saying: "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." She knew women were being opted into the voting System because outside of it, they represented a real threat to the System.
Helen Keller had this to say about the vote in 1911:
"Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee."
Goldman and Keller wanted real emancipation for Humanity. They knew that being co-opted into the System was no advance at all.

Getting women to demand the vote instead of working to change the System integrally worked so well, they did it again with "Feminism". Now they're working the same proven-effective program to get people to get behind gay marriage. They *want* gays to marry and they want it badly - lots of control and revenues.

These are all mechanisms to induct potential dissidents into the System.

If you want to see what real progressive about relationships ideas look like, I would recommend the discussion in this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyamory
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

Deep Dark Diaspora

A very deep and dark level of the Diaspora is when they've got us so disconnected from who we are that we become a simulation, or worse, a parody, of OurSelves - when the Hebrews become Jew-ish and the Irish become Eire-ish, for example.

We've reached that abysmal level of Diaspora and being cut off from OurSelves when we begin to undertake study of our culture and language as subjects with an air of anthropological objectivity and having to satisfy course requirements as per the instructors' instructions: Jewish studies, Aboriginal studies, Black studies, Celtic language studies, Women's studies are examples. When an Irishman or Irishwoman in the Diaspora enrolls in a college course to learn how to be Irish and how to speak Irish - that person is DEEP in the Diaspora.
When we behold our Culture and our Languages with the desire to connect with them and, concomitantly, observe them with detached objectivity, as though they are a smear on a slide, we are far, far down into the Diaspora.
It's OK to learn about other cultures, of course, but when one learns about one's own culture in a university; the Diaspora is deep and very dark.

Then, as they do to the Jews, adding insult to injury; they tell you that you are not who and what you claim to be. They tell you that you are some kind of imposter. They will soon do this to the Irish and to the Aboriginals and to the Tibetans. They haven't done it yet because your Diaspora is not long enough yet. You still have too much genetic memory. But as you assimilate, they will do this to you. So, stop the process now.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

Free Gaza  - and Israel Too

I'm all for freeing Gaza. But let's not forget about freeing Israel too. We are not less under siege because we are the subjects that are allowed to live in better conditions so that the world doesn't realize we're being used as a proxy implementing European policy.
Massa always gave the house niggas a few more peas in their rice, kept them feeling a bit superior to the field hands and gave them a sense of having what to lose if they didn't cooperate. Israel is Britain's house nigga.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

The Container and The Contained

The error of thinking that the container must be larger than the contained is further extended into the misunderstanding that the container must be greater than the contained.
When that basic mistake is extrapolated into space, we are left with the idea that we are insignificant in relation to giant balls of gas. We think that we are contained in space and do not realize that space is contained within us.
When that basic mistake is extended to nature, we make the mistake of thinking that nature is our mother. Nature is not our mother. Nature and everything in nature is our child. The reasons that we see all of the various elements of nature is not because we are born of them, but because they are physical expressions of our Souls that have become actualized. Yes, we are antecedent to nature.
When that basic mistake is extended to time, we think that that which is older than we imagine ourselves to be must have existed before us. We are fully capable of bringing that which is vastly older than the form we are now in into existence - and we do - continuously.
We are likewise capable of bringing that which is wiser than we imagine ourselves to be into existence. All of the Sages from whom we have learned did not precede us. We brought their Wisdom out from our depths, attributed a context to them and a time and learned from them. This is a conversation that we have with our own depths.

 
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

ANARCHIST SYNTHESIS

The selfsame sectarian and factionalist tendencies which urged Sébastien Faure and Voline (Vsevolod Mikhailovich Eikhenbaum) to express the concept of ANARCHIST SYNTHESIS (or ORGANIC ANARCHY, that is: the idea the Anarchism must be characterised by the same creative dynamic, ever-changing equilibria that characterise Life itself) in the early 20^th Century have reemerged today.

https://libcom.org/library/anarchist-synthesis

http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/sebastien-faure-the-anarchist-synthesis

It is, then, apposite that we may review their monumental theoretical achievement – the Synthesis of all that is worthy and good in the various streams of authentic Anarchy so that we may progress toward the actualization thereof.

Please note: Though the Synthesis is comprehensive and maximally generous of Spirit and mind; there are Anarchist tendencies that it does not recognize as genuine and well-intentioned, to wit: The Platform and Anarcho-Capitalism.

The Synthesis which Faure and Voline envisioned was a Synthesis of three complementary, supplementary and necessarily-existing moments in Anarchism. They are:
1) Anarcho-Syndicalism
2) Anarcho-Collectivism/Communism
3) Anarcho-Individualism
Today, we would include as  mutually compatable with these various Moments of Anarchism such ideas as Anarcho-Feminism, Anarcho-Primitivism (which can exist in the same world with various Anarchist hi-tech Communities) and , in fact, all forms of Anarchism that do not contradict the above Principles.
However, let not the disingenuous include themselves. Let us not be deflected from our course by either factionalism or specious argumentation. "Anarcho-Capitalism" is a misnomer and disingenuous. The Platform is naught be Bolshevism rephrased in Anarchist terms so that the poison might be swallowed and then corrode us from within.

Faure, Voline and their contemporaries did not have to grapple with an issue that has become pervasive and invasive in our times. That issue is the deliberate creation of an effete, vapid, spoilt Middle Class that demands instant, cheap and easily-gained satisfaction, particularly among young people. In their time, most Americans and Europeans alike were serious-minded and they possessed the ballast of common sense and responsibility. They had to in order to survive. Today, we must struggle with 'attitude', vapidity, reduced attention span and a generalized light-headedness that was very carefully, and perfidiously, cultivated because the "elite" understands that such minds are not disposed to consider matters seriously or deeply and are apt to quickly find an equilibrium in the simple, diluted and degraded when presented with new, possibly socially-arousing, ideas.
The cultivation of snarky light-headedness among the Middle Class was found to be less bloody, yet far more effective, in preventing unity among groups that might effect social change than the internecine struggles that were fomented in the past to undermine social Movements.
There was no "Spectacle" at the beginning of the 20^th Century. We must fight mightily against that phenomenon today. Paradoxically emptiness is, in our times, our most obdurate and obstinate obstacle.

These caveats having been expressed, let us, in the Spirit of Solidarity and  Love, consider now the principles of SYNTHESIS (or ORGANIC) ANARCHISM.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com

ZIONISM IS NOT WHAT YOU THOUGHT

"Zionism" is not the vision of Tziyyon of the Hebrew Prophets.
The Anglicization of the Hebrew concept Tziyyon was used to fool the Jews into thinking that they and the British were on the same page.

This is Zionism:

http://historytogo.utah.gov/people/ethnic_cultures/the_peoples_of_utah/imperialzion.html

http://www.hymntime.com/tch/htm/g/l/o/glorious.htm

Therefore, the Zionists are the Germanic-British Imperialists and those living in their colonies, NOT the Israelis.
The Americans, the Canadians, the South Africans, the Australians, the New Zealanders ARE THE ZIONISTS.

Let's start using the term Zionist correctly. It's more likely YOU than the Jews living in Israel.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel

DoreenDotan@gmail.com

DISAMBIGUATION: ZIONISM

Disambiguation about "Zionism" is in order. I've seen comments from people who think they're very enlightened when they say that you can't blame all of the Jews for the actions of the Zionists and I just shake my head in sorrow at the depth of the benightedness, total lack of self-reflection or critique and hypocrisy.

"Zionism" is not what we Hebrews call Tziyyonut, which is the vision of our Prophets.
"Zionism" is Germanic (including British of course) Imperialism.

The Jews are, in fact, Indigenous to the Land of Israel and we have every right to be here. In fact, we have no right to be in any of the European Imperialist colonies, to wit: The US, Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand - to mention some of the worst offenders - just as the Europeans have no right to be there.

http://www.hymntime.com/tch/htm/g/l/o/glorious.htm

http://historytogo.utah.gov/.../the.../imperialzion.html

The effect of Zionism is that New York City is 0.1% Native. Now that, good Europeans, is real Zionism. Decry it much?

The carefully crafted conflation of "Zionism" with Tziyyonut is intended to keep your attention off the fact that those who are not Indigenous and are living in any of the European colonies are the Zionist Occupiers . As the second link shows, the Celts are represented among the Zionists.

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com

On Religion and Addiction

I've been thinking about the similarity between addiction and fake religion (as opposed to true religion) lately.

The difference between being an addict and living Life normally is very much like the difference between fake religion and real religion.

In both addiction and fake religion the underlying problem is the inability to recognize the beauty in Life and feel reverent awe for the holiness of Life and all existence. And so, in order to feel something intensely, we begin to make a facsimile and do a parody, a ceremonial representation, an exaggeration to the point of grotesque reenactment of the elements of Life. Eventually the caricature of Life becomes a mockery of Life.

It is painful for me to admit, but nonetheless true, that Judaism is the most guilty of having created an elaborate ceremonial travesty. This farce is based on not understanding what Torah is really saying and, as a result, Jews perform ceremonies when we should be living Life in the full awareness of the indwelling sanctity. Then, not being satisfied by these artificial enactments of Life, just as those who are addicted to refined sugar instead of eating fruit and those addicted to opioids instead of living Life in such a way that the normal levels of dopamine will be produced in the brain, and like those who are addicted to sex because they do not know how to make love; so the Jew finds only emptiness in the ceremonial re-enactment of what he has not understood. Instead of rethinking his understanding, he compounds the ceremonies with additional strictures and customs. Finding himself even more separated from his Soul and feeling ever more starved for what he really needs and desperate, he becomes rigid and adamant and intolerant.

The Catholics learned to perform ceremonies instead of living Life from the Jews. They are doing re-enactments of the re-enactments of the Jews compounded by their complete removal from the Source.

It is good that the Protestants rejected the many ceremonies of Catholicism. At least, they are not burdened with re-enacting re-enactments on top of further misunderstanding the misunderstandings of the Jews.

Both addiction and fake religion derive from some occlusion in the Soul that does not allow the natural appreciation of the greatness of Life and they are  hyperbolic experiences of what should be normal Life experiences for those who are occluded and numbed to the point of not seeing the obvious, ambient sanctity of Life and wonder in all that is.

The torments of addiction eventually lead the occluded Soul to force himself or herself to look at the Universe and ask what is wrong. Eventually, the addict is brought to his or her knees and surrenders.
Dare we be as hopeful for the Rabbis?

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com