Friday, March 26, 2010
ASPARTAME - ORIGINALLY FORMULATED AS AN INSECTICIDE
Cathy O'Brien has stated that the sweetner/neurotoxin ASPARTAME is used in large doses daily on mind control subjects.
Joel Lord, MD posted this on Facebook:
"It turns out ASPARTAME is incredibly effective at eliminating ANTS! "I opened two packets of aspartame sweetener, and dumped one in a corner of each of our bathrooms . That was about 2 years ago and I have not seen any carpenter ants for about 9 to 12 months. It works better than the most deadly poisons I have tried. Any time they show up again, I simply dump another package of NutraSweet in a corner.
This is the rest of the communication he received:
"We live in the woods and carpenter ants are a huge problem. We have spent thousands of dollars with Orkin and on ant poisons trying to keep them under control but nothing has helped.
So when I read somewhere that aspartame *(NutraSweet)* was actually
developed as an ant poison and changed to being considered non-poisonous
after it was realized that a lot more money could be made on it as a sweetener than as an ant poison, I decided to give it a try.
I opened two packets of aspartame sweetener, and dumped one in a corner of each of our bathrooms . That was about 2 years ago and I have not seen any carpenter ants for about 9 to 12 months. It works better than the most deadly poisons I have tried. Any time they show up again, I simply dump another package of NutraSweet in a corner, and they will be gone for a year or so again.
Since posting this information I have had many people tell me of their success solving ant problems with this substance, when nothing else worked.
I found later that small black ants would not eat the aspartame. It was determined that if you mixed it with apple juice, they would quickly take it back to the nest, and all would be dead within 24 hours, usually. I have found that sometimes it will kill them, and sometimes it does not. Not sure why, may be slightly different species of ants or something.
Fire Ants: We got our first fire ant hill about 2 weeks ago. Poison did not work. We tried aspartame and the ants ignored it until we got a light rain. It was just a sprinkle, enough to moisten the NutraSweet and ground, but not enough to wash it away. They went crazy, hundreds of them grabbing it and taking it back into the mound. When I checked the mound 2 days later, there was no sign of the fire ants. I even dug the mound up, and still saw none of them.
How does it Work: *Aspartame is a neuropoison.* It most likely kills the ants by interfering with their nervous system. It could be direct, like stopping their heart, or something more subtle like killing their sense of taste so they can't figure out what is edible, or smell, so they can't follow their trails, or mis- identify their colonies members, so they start fighting each other. Not sure what causes them to end up dying, just know that for many species of ants it will kill them quickly and effectively. As with any poison I recommend wearing gloves and washing any skin areas that come in contact with this poison, and avoid getting it in your mouth, despite anything the labeling may indicate."
Joel Lord writes:
"ASPARTAME: contents -
a) 40% aspartic acid (excito toxin which stimulates neurons in the brain to death)
b) 10% Methel Ester (immediately becomes Methol Alcohol – severe metabolic poison, converts to formaldehyde causing metabolic acidosis).
c) 50% Fenol Alonine – isolate neuro-toxin (floods brain, lowers seizure threshold, depletes serotonin, causes psychiatric & behavioral problems & interacts with ALL anti-depressants)
d) Whole molecule breaks down to Akidokiprecene (Brain tumor agent) which triggers brain tumors based on original study results
e) Aspartame is a genetically engineered poison cultured from the fecal matter of E-coli bacteria
f) Also an accelerant which causes male sexual disfunction
g) Aspartame lost its patent recently. Thus it is now open season on the formula. It is now being processed all over the place listed as ‘vanillin’ & ‘flavoring’
Aspartame: Rumsfeld’s Bio Weapon
http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=11fbf6c71f84684d&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_frqysnf0&zw
Aspartame; Toxic effects
http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=11fbf6c71f84684d&attid=0.2&disp=inline&realattid=f_frqyu98v&zw
VRM: Health Matters
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=825 "
ASPARTAME is used *widely* in Israel - most in sugarless gums and candies which are marketed such that parents thin that they are protecting their children from obesity and dental caries.
It is also used in many drinks that are marketed as naturally fruit-flavored mineral water. Again, the message is: this is healthy for your children than the sugary originals.
Aspartame has been renamed AminoSweet, which is being touted as a natural sweetener!
http://www.puppetgov.com/2010/02/13/aspartame-renamed-aminosweet-and-is-now-being-marketed-as-a-natural-sweetener/
D2
Cathy O'Brien has stated that the sweetner/neurotoxin ASPARTAME is used in large doses daily on mind control subjects.
Joel Lord, MD posted this on Facebook:
"It turns out ASPARTAME is incredibly effective at eliminating ANTS! "I opened two packets of aspartame sweetener, and dumped one in a corner of each of our bathrooms . That was about 2 years ago and I have not seen any carpenter ants for about 9 to 12 months. It works better than the most deadly poisons I have tried. Any time they show up again, I simply dump another package of NutraSweet in a corner.
This is the rest of the communication he received:
"We live in the woods and carpenter ants are a huge problem. We have spent thousands of dollars with Orkin and on ant poisons trying to keep them under control but nothing has helped.
So when I read somewhere that aspartame *(NutraSweet)* was actually
developed as an ant poison and changed to being considered non-poisonous
after it was realized that a lot more money could be made on it as a sweetener than as an ant poison, I decided to give it a try.
I opened two packets of aspartame sweetener, and dumped one in a corner of each of our bathrooms . That was about 2 years ago and I have not seen any carpenter ants for about 9 to 12 months. It works better than the most deadly poisons I have tried. Any time they show up again, I simply dump another package of NutraSweet in a corner, and they will be gone for a year or so again.
Since posting this information I have had many people tell me of their success solving ant problems with this substance, when nothing else worked.
I found later that small black ants would not eat the aspartame. It was determined that if you mixed it with apple juice, they would quickly take it back to the nest, and all would be dead within 24 hours, usually. I have found that sometimes it will kill them, and sometimes it does not. Not sure why, may be slightly different species of ants or something.
Fire Ants: We got our first fire ant hill about 2 weeks ago. Poison did not work. We tried aspartame and the ants ignored it until we got a light rain. It was just a sprinkle, enough to moisten the NutraSweet and ground, but not enough to wash it away. They went crazy, hundreds of them grabbing it and taking it back into the mound. When I checked the mound 2 days later, there was no sign of the fire ants. I even dug the mound up, and still saw none of them.
How does it Work: *Aspartame is a neuropoison.* It most likely kills the ants by interfering with their nervous system. It could be direct, like stopping their heart, or something more subtle like killing their sense of taste so they can't figure out what is edible, or smell, so they can't follow their trails, or mis- identify their colonies members, so they start fighting each other. Not sure what causes them to end up dying, just know that for many species of ants it will kill them quickly and effectively. As with any poison I recommend wearing gloves and washing any skin areas that come in contact with this poison, and avoid getting it in your mouth, despite anything the labeling may indicate."
Joel Lord writes:
"ASPARTAME: contents -
a) 40% aspartic acid (excito toxin which stimulates neurons in the brain to death)
b) 10% Methel Ester (immediately becomes Methol Alcohol – severe metabolic poison, converts to formaldehyde causing metabolic acidosis).
c) 50% Fenol Alonine – isolate neuro-toxin (floods brain, lowers seizure threshold, depletes serotonin, causes psychiatric & behavioral problems & interacts with ALL anti-depressants)
d) Whole molecule breaks down to Akidokiprecene (Brain tumor agent) which triggers brain tumors based on original study results
e) Aspartame is a genetically engineered poison cultured from the fecal matter of E-coli bacteria
f) Also an accelerant which causes male sexual disfunction
g) Aspartame lost its patent recently. Thus it is now open season on the formula. It is now being processed all over the place listed as ‘vanillin’ & ‘flavoring’
Aspartame: Rumsfeld’s Bio Weapon
http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=11fbf6c71f84684d&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_frqysnf0&zw
Aspartame; Toxic effects
http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=11fbf6c71f84684d&attid=0.2&disp=inline&realattid=f_frqyu98v&zw
VRM: Health Matters
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=825 "
ASPARTAME is used *widely* in Israel - most in sugarless gums and candies which are marketed such that parents thin that they are protecting their children from obesity and dental caries.
It is also used in many drinks that are marketed as naturally fruit-flavored mineral water. Again, the message is: this is healthy for your children than the sugary originals.
Aspartame has been renamed AminoSweet, which is being touted as a natural sweetener!
http://www.puppetgov.com/2010/02/13/aspartame-renamed-aminosweet-and-is-now-being-marketed-as-a-natural-sweetener/
D2
Thursday, March 18, 2010
A Gentile Asks if the Rabbis Turning Gentiles Into Donkeys is Sorcery
I received this inquiry from a gentile: "I was wondering: have you found anything in your studies to indicate that the sections of the talmud that discuss rabbis turning people into donkeys and how to tell if demons have visited during the night (by reason of circle of flour around your bed) are foreign?"
I answered:
Here read it for yourself:
"It has been taught: Abba Benjamin says, If the eye had the power to see them, no creature could endure the demons. Abaye says: They are more numerous than we are and they surround us like the ridge round a field. R. Huna says: Every one among us has a thousand on his left hand and ten thousand on his right hand.2 Raba says: The crushing in the Kallah3 lectures comes from them.4 Fatigue in the knees comes from them. The wearing out of the clothes of the scholars is due to their rubbing against them. The bruising of the feet comes from them. If one wants to discover them,5 let him take sifted ashes and sprinkle around his bed, and in the morning he will see something like the footprints of a cock. If one wishes to see them, let him take the after-birth of a black she-cat, the offspring of a black she-cat, the first-born of a first-born, let him roast it in fire and grind it to powder, and then let him put some into his eye, and he will see them. Let him also pour it into an iron tube and seal it with an iron signet that they6 should not steal it from him. Let him also close his mouth, lest he come to harm. R. Bibi b. Abaye did so,7 saw them and came to harm. The scholars, however, prayed for him and he recovered. "
http://www.come-and-hear.com/berakoth/berakoth_6.html
Now do you understand how we turn gentiles into asses?
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
I received this inquiry from a gentile: "I was wondering: have you found anything in your studies to indicate that the sections of the talmud that discuss rabbis turning people into donkeys and how to tell if demons have visited during the night (by reason of circle of flour around your bed) are foreign?"
I answered:
Here read it for yourself:
"It has been taught: Abba Benjamin says, If the eye had the power to see them, no creature could endure the demons. Abaye says: They are more numerous than we are and they surround us like the ridge round a field. R. Huna says: Every one among us has a thousand on his left hand and ten thousand on his right hand.2 Raba says: The crushing in the Kallah3 lectures comes from them.4 Fatigue in the knees comes from them. The wearing out of the clothes of the scholars is due to their rubbing against them. The bruising of the feet comes from them. If one wants to discover them,5 let him take sifted ashes and sprinkle around his bed, and in the morning he will see something like the footprints of a cock. If one wishes to see them, let him take the after-birth of a black she-cat, the offspring of a black she-cat, the first-born of a first-born, let him roast it in fire and grind it to powder, and then let him put some into his eye, and he will see them. Let him also pour it into an iron tube and seal it with an iron signet that they6 should not steal it from him. Let him also close his mouth, lest he come to harm. R. Bibi b. Abaye did so,7 saw them and came to harm. The scholars, however, prayed for him and he recovered. "
http://www.come-and-hear.com/berakoth/berakoth_6.html
Now do you understand how we turn gentiles into asses?
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Moral Intelligence Test for Gentiles Who Presume to Criticize Jewish Law
Want to take a quick moral intelligence test that will show the difference between how Jews and gentiles think?
What are the Rabbis talking about in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yevamot 59b (scroll down for 59b)
http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_59.html
If one is like most presumptuous gentiles who attempt to understand and pass judgment on Jewish Law, you might interpret the teaching together with the Xian who wrote this repulsive passage:
"A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to many a priest - even a High
Priest, unless specifically warned in advance, and the act had been seen by two witnesses.
(What is meant by "beast" we are not quite sure since this may not have referred to
four-footed beasts, but to those humans who were known as "goy" and were considered to be human beasts.)"
http://www.samliquidation.com/talmud.htm
The discussion of the Rabbis in Yevamot 59 is the correct and incorrect application of a fortiori reasoning.
While there most certainly is a fortiori reasoning in Talmudic interpretation of Torah, and it is used to arrive at deep understandings of that which is just and that which is not, the use of it to heap up blame is not one of them.
There is no doubt from the passage given originally that the Rabbis viewed bestiality as a very, very grave sin. She is, if she did this of her own consent, to be stoned.
What is stoning? The Hebrew word for stoning is skilah. Do you see that it looks like the word school? It is actually related to that. One who committed these offenses needs to be *schooled*. There is no evidence in Jewish history that actual stoning *ever* took place. The conditions under which one would be stoned are so physically impossible that to carry it out is extremely unlikely. But the Rabbis are also speaking of the heaping up of stones against a person. They are saying: You may NOT assume that a person committed a lesser offense because they committed a graver one.
What the Rabbis are saying is: you may NOT infer that if someone committed witting bestiality that they also committed other sexual offenses. A woman who committed willing bestiality is not to be assumed to be a harlot as well.
The following passage shows this clearly.
"This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar.4 If [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 — R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10 she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded14 by a splinter!"
http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_59.html
The gentiles, in interpreting Jewish Law as they do, prove the truth of another Jewish teaching: "Everyone who finds fault in another is projecting his own fault."
Perhaps it would be wiser for gentiles not to attempt to understand Jewish Law and, in so doing, project the depravity that exists in their own troubled psyches for all the world to see.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Want to take a quick moral intelligence test that will show the difference between how Jews and gentiles think?
What are the Rabbis talking about in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Yevamot 59b (scroll down for 59b)
http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_59.html
If one is like most presumptuous gentiles who attempt to understand and pass judgment on Jewish Law, you might interpret the teaching together with the Xian who wrote this repulsive passage:
"A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to many a priest - even a High
Priest, unless specifically warned in advance, and the act had been seen by two witnesses.
(What is meant by "beast" we are not quite sure since this may not have referred to
four-footed beasts, but to those humans who were known as "goy" and were considered to be human beasts.)"
http://www.samliquidation.com/talmud.htm
The discussion of the Rabbis in Yevamot 59 is the correct and incorrect application of a fortiori reasoning.
While there most certainly is a fortiori reasoning in Talmudic interpretation of Torah, and it is used to arrive at deep understandings of that which is just and that which is not, the use of it to heap up blame is not one of them.
There is no doubt from the passage given originally that the Rabbis viewed bestiality as a very, very grave sin. She is, if she did this of her own consent, to be stoned.
What is stoning? The Hebrew word for stoning is skilah. Do you see that it looks like the word school? It is actually related to that. One who committed these offenses needs to be *schooled*. There is no evidence in Jewish history that actual stoning *ever* took place. The conditions under which one would be stoned are so physically impossible that to carry it out is extremely unlikely. But the Rabbis are also speaking of the heaping up of stones against a person. They are saying: You may NOT assume that a person committed a lesser offense because they committed a graver one.
What the Rabbis are saying is: you may NOT infer that if someone committed witting bestiality that they also committed other sexual offenses. A woman who committed willing bestiality is not to be assumed to be a harlot as well.
The following passage shows this clearly.
"This1 represents the view of2 R. Meir,3 while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar.4 If [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse5 when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a harlot,6 R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!7 — R. Joseph replied:8 When, for instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' may be applied but not that of harlot.9 Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah10 she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot11 she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman,12 [it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,13 you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded14 by a splinter!"
http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth/yebamoth_59.html
The gentiles, in interpreting Jewish Law as they do, prove the truth of another Jewish teaching: "Everyone who finds fault in another is projecting his own fault."
Perhaps it would be wiser for gentiles not to attempt to understand Jewish Law and, in so doing, project the depravity that exists in their own troubled psyches for all the world to see.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Friday, March 12, 2010
List of Stateless Minorities in Europe
Next time a European, or anyone else for that matter, starts flapping their lips and wagging their fingers at the Israelis about the Palestinian situation, give them this.
The person who sent it to me wrote: In response to somebody's comment about the Israeli/Palestinian situation, I've taken the liberty of compiling a list of indigenous ethnic and linguistic minorities in Europe who "do not" have a sovereign nation to call their own. I know that this list is only a fraction of the "stateless" societies in Europe.
Alsatian people (in Alsace-France)
Basque people (in France and Spain)
Breton people (in Brittany-France)... See More
Catalan people (in France and Spain)
Cornish people (in Cornwall-UK)
Corsican people (in Corsica)
Crimean Tatars (in Crimean Peninsula-Ukraine)
Faroese people (in Faroe Islands-Denmark)
Flemish people (in Flanders regions-Belgium, France, Netherlands)
Frisian people (in Frisian Islands-Netherlands and Germany)
Gagauz people (Gagauzia-Moldova, Romania, Turkey, and Balkan Peninsula)
Gajal people (East Thrace-Turkey; Balkan Peninsula countries)
Galician people (in Galicia-Spain)
Gorani people (mainly in Kosovo; some in Albania and Macedonia)
Hutsul people (in Carpathian Mountains region-Ukraine)
Inuit people (in Greenland-Denmark)
Kashubian people (in Pomerelia-Poland)
Lipka Tatars (mainly in Belarus, Lithuania, Poland)
Livonian people (Livonian Coast-Latvia)
Manx people (in Isle of Man)
Occitan people (in Occitania-France, Italy, Monaco, Spain)
Pomak people/Slavic Bulgarian Muslims (in the Balkans)
Roma Gypsies (mainly in Eastern Europe)
Romansh people (in Switzerland)
Rusyn people (mainly in the Balkans and Eastern Europe)
Saami people (in Lapland-Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russian Fed.)
Samogitian people (Samogitia region-Lithuania)
Sardinian people (in Sardinia-Italy)
Scottish people (in Scotland-UK)
Seto people (in Setomaa region-Estonia and Pskov Oblast-Russian Fed.)
Sicilian people (in Sicily-Italy)
Sorb people (in Lusatia-Germany)
Torbeš people/Slavic Macedonian Muslims (in Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia)
Vlachs (mainly in the Balkans)
Võros people (in Võrumaa region-Estonia)
Walloon people (in Wallonia-Belgium)
Welsh people (in Wales-UK)
and 160-300 ethnic groups in the Russian Federation
He also wrote: "It's very hypocritical for Europe to excoriate countries like Israel when Europeans are engaging in imperialism in their own backyards. If mainstream European society can't even allow the groups I just mentioned any kind of sovereignty, then why are they so desperate to seek sovereignty for people, like the Palestinians, who have NOTHING to do with them. I think the situation is something that Israelis and Palestinians need to work on together and Europe needs to take care of situations taking place in their own continent."
Shall we compile a list for "the Americas" ?
Next time a European, or anyone else for that matter, starts flapping their lips and wagging their fingers at the Israelis about the Palestinian situation, give them this.
The person who sent it to me wrote: In response to somebody's comment about the Israeli/Palestinian situation, I've taken the liberty of compiling a list of indigenous ethnic and linguistic minorities in Europe who "do not" have a sovereign nation to call their own. I know that this list is only a fraction of the "stateless" societies in Europe.
Alsatian people (in Alsace-France)
Basque people (in France and Spain)
Breton people (in Brittany-France)... See More
Catalan people (in France and Spain)
Cornish people (in Cornwall-UK)
Corsican people (in Corsica)
Crimean Tatars (in Crimean Peninsula-Ukraine)
Faroese people (in Faroe Islands-Denmark)
Flemish people (in Flanders regions-Belgium, France, Netherlands)
Frisian people (in Frisian Islands-Netherlands and Germany)
Gagauz people (Gagauzia-Moldova, Romania, Turkey, and Balkan Peninsula)
Gajal people (East Thrace-Turkey; Balkan Peninsula countries)
Galician people (in Galicia-Spain)
Gorani people (mainly in Kosovo; some in Albania and Macedonia)
Hutsul people (in Carpathian Mountains region-Ukraine)
Inuit people (in Greenland-Denmark)
Kashubian people (in Pomerelia-Poland)
Lipka Tatars (mainly in Belarus, Lithuania, Poland)
Livonian people (Livonian Coast-Latvia)
Manx people (in Isle of Man)
Occitan people (in Occitania-France, Italy, Monaco, Spain)
Pomak people/Slavic Bulgarian Muslims (in the Balkans)
Roma Gypsies (mainly in Eastern Europe)
Romansh people (in Switzerland)
Rusyn people (mainly in the Balkans and Eastern Europe)
Saami people (in Lapland-Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russian Fed.)
Samogitian people (Samogitia region-Lithuania)
Sardinian people (in Sardinia-Italy)
Scottish people (in Scotland-UK)
Seto people (in Setomaa region-Estonia and Pskov Oblast-Russian Fed.)
Sicilian people (in Sicily-Italy)
Sorb people (in Lusatia-Germany)
Torbeš people/Slavic Macedonian Muslims (in Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia)
Vlachs (mainly in the Balkans)
Võros people (in Võrumaa region-Estonia)
Walloon people (in Wallonia-Belgium)
Welsh people (in Wales-UK)
and 160-300 ethnic groups in the Russian Federation
He also wrote: "It's very hypocritical for Europe to excoriate countries like Israel when Europeans are engaging in imperialism in their own backyards. If mainstream European society can't even allow the groups I just mentioned any kind of sovereignty, then why are they so desperate to seek sovereignty for people, like the Palestinians, who have NOTHING to do with them. I think the situation is something that Israelis and Palestinians need to work on together and Europe needs to take care of situations taking place in their own continent."
Shall we compile a list for "the Americas" ?
Sunday, March 07, 2010
Review of Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World by Henry Makow
http://www.amazon.com/Illuminati-Cult-that-Hijacked-World/dp/1439211485
Henry Makow mentions me in this book on pg 11. He did not ask me if I wanted to have my name associated with this book. Had he requested permission to include my name in the book and had he sent me a manuscript before publication, I would have refused. I am beyond abashed that my name has been associated with the claims that are in this book.
One's first hint that something is wrong about any book that purports to be the product of research that deals with the very real economic conspiracy that has gripped the world is that it refers to the elite as "Illuminati". This term is meant to mystify. Honest researchers call them simply what they are – rich and connected.
While I am the first to say that Lurianic "kabbalah" is destructive to the Jewish People, and I have the support of many illustrious Rabbis on this point; I do not for a moment think that the Lurianic system is the true Kabbalah and I know it is of foreign, particularly Gnostic origin.
Having said that, Lurianism is not nearly as black as Makow describes it. If it were, it could not have infiltrated Jewish culture.
Compared to the purity of our Torah, Lurianic Gnosticism is impure and it is forbidden for Jews to fill their minds with such things. But it is not Satanism. It is actually purer than many gentile mystical traditions, including Xianity and Hinduism. It is not the horror that Makow, who admits to being an assimilated Jew who is ignorant of our Tradition and believes in Yeshu, claims.
I never thought the day would come that I would defend Lurianism against attack. But the claims of Makow are so outrageous that it has to be said that while Lurianism is forbidden to Jews because it is retooled Gnosticism; it is not Satanism.
There are so many outrageous and outraging, unfounded, contradictory, and necessarily uncited, accusations about the Jews in this book that I can hardly list them. I am too deeply appalled to repeat so much as a sampling of them.
I couldn't even bring myself to read the whole book, which Makow sent to me only after I asked him for a copy. I did so because I was informed that my name was in the book. Makow did not so much as send me a complimentary copy without my requesting it. It was so galling, so revolting, so offensive, that having found my name in the book after flipping through it a few times; I put it aside.
Never have I considered burning a book before. This one may just be fuel for our next Lag Ba'Omer bonfire.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
http://www.amazon.com/Illuminati-Cult-that-Hijacked-World/dp/1439211485
Henry Makow mentions me in this book on pg 11. He did not ask me if I wanted to have my name associated with this book. Had he requested permission to include my name in the book and had he sent me a manuscript before publication, I would have refused. I am beyond abashed that my name has been associated with the claims that are in this book.
One's first hint that something is wrong about any book that purports to be the product of research that deals with the very real economic conspiracy that has gripped the world is that it refers to the elite as "Illuminati". This term is meant to mystify. Honest researchers call them simply what they are – rich and connected.
While I am the first to say that Lurianic "kabbalah" is destructive to the Jewish People, and I have the support of many illustrious Rabbis on this point; I do not for a moment think that the Lurianic system is the true Kabbalah and I know it is of foreign, particularly Gnostic origin.
Having said that, Lurianism is not nearly as black as Makow describes it. If it were, it could not have infiltrated Jewish culture.
Compared to the purity of our Torah, Lurianic Gnosticism is impure and it is forbidden for Jews to fill their minds with such things. But it is not Satanism. It is actually purer than many gentile mystical traditions, including Xianity and Hinduism. It is not the horror that Makow, who admits to being an assimilated Jew who is ignorant of our Tradition and believes in Yeshu, claims.
I never thought the day would come that I would defend Lurianism against attack. But the claims of Makow are so outrageous that it has to be said that while Lurianism is forbidden to Jews because it is retooled Gnosticism; it is not Satanism.
There are so many outrageous and outraging, unfounded, contradictory, and necessarily uncited, accusations about the Jews in this book that I can hardly list them. I am too deeply appalled to repeat so much as a sampling of them.
I couldn't even bring myself to read the whole book, which Makow sent to me only after I asked him for a copy. I did so because I was informed that my name was in the book. Makow did not so much as send me a complimentary copy without my requesting it. It was so galling, so revolting, so offensive, that having found my name in the book after flipping through it a few times; I put it aside.
Never have I considered burning a book before. This one may just be fuel for our next Lag Ba'Omer bonfire.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel
DoreenDotan@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)